|Near & Middle East Titles:
Records of the Kurds: Territory, Revolt and Nationalism, 1831-1979
|ISBN: (13) 978-1-84097-325-9
Extent: 13 volumes, 9,800 pages, 1 map box
Editor: A. L. P. Burdett
Paper: Printed on acid free paper
Binding: Library bindings
See sample pages: not available
To enquire about a PRINTED version of this title, please use the button ADD TO ENQUIRY LIST. Then, go to ENQUIRY FORM page and follow the instructions.
These nine thousand pages of facsimile documents trace early insurgencies directed bythe Kurdish people against regional and metropolitan powers, and their interrelations with neighbouring tribes and other ethnic groups at historical flash points, from the origins of nationalist sentiments through a series of disparate revolts in the nineteenth century, and then on to a larger, more cohesive and discernible nationalist movement launched in the aftermath of World War I. They concomitantly depict the extent of territories pertaining to the Kurdish 'homeland', the use of the term 'Kurdistan' generally refers to an agreed geographical area, not to a legal or political entity.
Kurdish populated territory evolved over the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, with some regions becoming entrenched, others subject to constant flux. The map box provides illustrations of the changing territory, or those sections subject to alterations and contestation.
In this case an historical overview has been provided by guest contributors in their Historical Introduction, below.
Records of the Kurds: Territory, Revolt and Nationalism,1831–1979 offers an exhaustive account of Kurdistan’s geography in one of the most extensive documentary collections published to date. The collection includes extensive information on Kurdistan’s mountain passes and pastures; its forts, hamlets,villages, and small and large towns; its natural resources, such as water, oil,and items of trade; its roads, gorges, peaks, ridges, defiles, bridges, valleys, plains, deserts, marshes, and the like. Even the region’s geological, botanical, and zoological specimen are painstakingly catalogued.
This collection provides many highly valuable documents from the period, including those written by prominent Kurdish personalities and organizations, showing inparticular detail how the war and post-war world affected the identity and political allegiance of the people of Kurdistan. One of the other key aspects of the set is the insight it provides into the social and political developments in Kurdistan over an extended historical period. It charts the tensions amongst the Kurdish community as well as their interactions with neighbouring communities and their often-uneasy relationships with various states and their representatives. The collection also constitutes an extremely important record of the gradual growth and development of the Kurdish movement over the course of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.
The Kurdish ‘problem’, as it has often been labelled, has been a historiographical issue as well. The limited study of the area, often prevented by the pressures of regional states, however, is fast changing, and The Records of the Kurds,as the most extensive documentary source to be published so far, will only strengthen this trend and provide scholars from around the world with direct access to these extremely informative British documents.
All relevant documents which could betraced from the surviving records of the Government of India at the British Library, as well as the records of the Foreign Office, War Office, IndiaOffice, Colonial Office and Cabinet at the National Archives pertaining to Kurds or to Kurdistan as a regional entity for the period have been sourced and included, with the exception of duplicates and draft documents.
There were at least two major Kurdish revolts during this period, chiefly as a direct result of the Perso-Turkish War of 1828-29
By1838 British officials had begun referring to a “the Kurdish question” particularly in regards to free migration
Further revolts occurred at Van, led by Bedr (or Pedr) Khan in 1846-47, leading to reprisals, including the arrest of numerous Beys over 1849-52
Revoltat Jezirah at 1854
Volume 2 (1856-1878)
Traces the impact of administrative changes set out by the Ottoman government and an increased international interest, which followed the Treaty of Paris 1856, in the Kurds and Kurdistan
Swell in Kurdish activism with a significant revolt taking place in Van in 1856, with another being led by Bedr Khan in 1858-59
Unrest accelerated from 1876, initially over the Kurdish resistance to conscriptioninto the Ottoman army, and by 1878 parts of the region, notably around Kharput,were said to be verging on the state of anarchy
Dersim Rebellion 1878-79
Volume 3 (1879-1899)
Astate of chaos prevailed in Van vilayetat the start of 1879. By August the Kurds of Hakkiari were in a state of open revolt with Shaikh Abeydullah as their leader
While increased military activity and tensions on the Perso-Turkish border in 1881caused hardship for and resentment among Kurds trying to cross the frontier, 100,000 Kurdish families nonetheless reportedly fled Persia for Turkish territory
A state of turbulence continued from 1883-1887, leading to virtual autonomy insome regions, including Hekkiari. This was ended by an Ottoman expedition in1890 with the specific aim of repressing the Kurds
Intra-Kurdishquarrels broke out in 1894
Volume 4 (1900-1914)
August 1905 Kurdish forces under the leadership of Ibrahim Pasha were at the gates of Diarbekir
January 1905 they sent a petition appealing to HMG to be placed directly under British protection
Young Turk Revolution of 1908
Revolts at Moush in 1910, Khuyt in 1911, and under the leader Simko (who became active from 1913), all with the goal of seeking Kurdish autonomy from the Committee of Union and Progress
Outbreak of World War One
Volume 5 (1914-1920)
A special mission under Major E Noel was sent to approach Shaikh Mahmoud to represent British interests in Suleimaniya. Shaikh Mahmoud was initially made governor, albeit with limited powers, but by 1919 had turned on the British and had become the leader of a series of revolts.
The Cabinet in November 1919 cited policy as being aimed at “setting up a ring of autonomous Kurdish states around the border of the Arab vilayet of Mosul”. Instark contrast to this, a policy was then adopted in January 1920 to not file amandate for Kurdistan, while also not permitting its restoration to Turkey, nor supporting its partition. In addition, Lord Curzon at the San Remo conference of April 1920 had begun expressing doubts about the direction for Kurdistan
Volume 6 (1921-1926)
The diplomatic failure of the Allies to sufficiently advance the provision for a Kurdish state set off a chain of revolts in areas of the former vilayet of Kurdistan beginning with Simko's campaign.
Allied reversal of the agreement of 1923, reached at the Lausanne Conference, dashes the diplomatic creation of a Kurdish respecting the Kemalist government
Turkish government overthrown by Mustafa Kemal Attaturk in 1923
Major revolts continued to erupt, notably in 1925 in the form of the Shaikh Said rebellion, and again with the Dersim revolt in Turkey which led to martial law being declared.
Retreat and exile of Simko to Iraq in late 1926
Volume 7 (1926-1929)
By June 1927 one official was expressing the view that the Kurdish nationalist movement had reached a hiatus
The attitude and policy of the Kemalist government was now impacting on the Kurds,the policy involved plans for mass deportations along with a campaign of repressionof nationalist activities from July-December 1927
Kurdish declaration of independence and establishing of the Republic of Ararat in 1927
Evaluation undertaken of the consequences of the defeat in June 1929 of Iranian Kurds in the attempted Mangur Revolt
Volume 8 (1930-1939)
Volume includes a significant British review of policy and promises made to Kurds which were undertaken in the context of Anglo-Iraqi cooperation in August 1930
Mass meetings of Kurds and plans for a major anti-Arab revolt in Iraq, 1931.
The Khoybun Revolt took place over the period 1929-31, leading to attempts to define the boundaries of Kurdistan in 1931-32
Forced migration during the period 1939-1945, in which one estimate claims 700,000 Kurds died
Volume 9 (1941-1944)
Covers the World War 2 period in which both Iran and Iraq were effectively under Allied occupation
A Kurdish revolt occurred in Persia in December 1941, supported by Assyrian and Chaldean factions, leading to full military engagement with Iranian forces, and ultimately a Kurdish defeat in January 1942.
Continued disturbances in western Iran January 1942, notably the Kurdish advanced on Rezaieh in western Azerbaijan
Unrest among Kurds in the autumn of 1942 led to Iranian military operations and surveillance in northern Kurdistan.
Various incidents involving Kurds, such as an attack on Mazlu village, suggested they would not undertake attacks if Russians offered any resistance. The frontier situation from August 1943 points to a lack of control, allowing for subsequent incursions and cross-border raids by Kurds
Volume 10 (1945-1950)
From 1945, the Iraqi Kurdish situation had become focused on the activities of Mullah Mustapha. A report from Capt. Stokes, the Political Adviser at Erbil, referred to “the confederacyof Barzan” as an “autonomous Kurdistan” established by Mullah Mustafa
Tours of the region by British officials in late 1945, aimed at assess the interaction between local officials and Mullah Mustafa.
This period also saw the formation of political protest parties, the ”Kurdish Democratic Party” dates from 1946 for example.
Temporary creation of “The autonomous Republic of Azerbaijan” in the western Azerbaijan area of Mahabad,1946. Mahabad continued to be a focal point the nationalist movement, at least until 1949.
Volume 11 (1951-1965)
Barzan revolt of 1954
The Shah launches an attack against the Juamri Kurds 1956
Iraq coup of 1958
Decision was made by many Iraqi Kurds in February 1963 start a revolt under leadership of Mullah Barzani
Iranian assistance was offered to Iraqi Kurds in 1963
Negotiationsin 1964 for a ceasefire among the Iraqi Kurds proved unfruitful and gave way to renewed fighting in 1965.
Volume 12 (1966-1979)
The period begins with a strategic conference in Iraq which planned to remove Kurdsfrom all oil-bearing areas in 1966, this was at a time when HMG had effectively declared neutrality on the (Iraq) Kurdish question
Mustafa al Barzani delivered a list of demands to the Iraq government in April 1966
Coup d’etat in Iraq in 1968
Over 400,000 Kurds were expelled by the government of Iraq over 1970-76, despite the terms of the 1970 “settlement” negotiated with the Government and accepted by Mullah Mustapha.
Growing tensions between Kurds and government of Iraq were evident in 1973, and an ultimatum was given to the KDP by Saddam Hussein in March 1974
Iraqi Kurdish refugees in Iran and their forcible re-settlement from 1976-1977affected wider relations between Britain, Iran and Iraq
The Pahlevi regime in February 1979, labelled the KDPas “counter-revolutionary” following the setting up of KDP HQ at Mahabad - their first revolt since 1949
M.325.01. “Sketch of the Countrybetween Erzeroom and the River Jorookh”. 1847.
M.325.02. “Sketch of the Province of Zohab.” c. 1852.
M.325.03. Map showing delimitation lines for theTurkey–Russia boundary. 1857.
M.325.04 “Map illustrative of the Administrative sub-divisions in the Vilayetof Trebizond”. c.1884.
M.325.05 “Map illustrative of the question of the junction of the Kerassondand Karahissar Roads.” c.1884.
M.325.06. “A Map illustrative of the Ordoo–Sivas Route,1884.”
M.325.07. “Map Communicated to the Erzeroum Commission by the Ottoman Commissioner in 1843”.
M.325.08. “Map of part of the Turko-Persian Frontier. Reduced from the Anglo-Russian ‘Identic Map’ completed in 1869.
M.325.09. “General map showing approximately the Turco-Persian frontier, c.1885.”
M.325.10. “Road sketch map of Charbahur to Akhlat, 1906.”
M.325.11. “Road sketch map of Erzerum to Charbahur, 1906.”
M.325.12. “Mesopotamia. Administrative Divisions & Chief Towns”. 1916.
M.325.13. “Mesopotamia. Racial Divisions”. 1916.
M.325.14. “Map to illustrate the Agreement of 1916 in regard to Asia Minor, Mesopotamia, &c.”.
M.325.15. “Central Kurdistan Tribal & Communication Map”. 1921.
M.325.16. “Rough sketch map of Nerva and Raikan districts”. 1921.
M.325.17. “Sketch Situation Map of 7th Turkish Army Corps”. 1925.
M.325.18. “Tribal map of Central Kurdistan (Area 9.).” 1929.
M.325.19. “Political Adviser’s sketch map of Main Tribes West and North-West, Kermanshah.” 1945.
M.325.20. Map entitled “Kurdish Tribes of Persian Kurdistan”. 1945.
M.325.21. “Map to accompany memoranda on ‘Armenian & Georgian claims to Turkish Territory’ & ‘The Kurds of Turkey’”. 1946.
M.325.22. “Map showing distribution of Kurds”. 1946.
M.325.24 “Map showing Distribution of Kurds.” 1946.
M.325.25. “Distribution of Kurds”. 1962.
M.325.26. “OR5395, Iraq”. c. 1974.
M.325.27. “Distribution of Kurds.” 1979.
M.325.28. “The Kurdish area.” 1979.
M.325.29. Section depicting “Kordestan”. 1979.
Mapswithout an accompanying document in the volumes
M.325.30. “Map of the Ottoman Dominions in Asia with the adjacent frontiers of Russian and Persian Empires.”1828.
M.325.31. “Outline Map of Central and Southern Kurdistan. To accompany report of my travels in Kurdistan 1881-2.”
M.325.32. “(Part 2) Central Kurdistan.”1894.
M.325.33. Section of “Map of Eastern Turkey in Asia, Syria, Western Persia.” 1910.
M.325.34. “Map to illustrate boundaries proposed for Armenia and Kurdistan…”. Hand dated 4-2-18.
M.325.35. Hydrographical Section, General Staff, No. 2555. 1916, (1918).
M.325.36. “Armenian & Kurdish Area Map.” Baghdad 11-8-19.
M.325.37. “Map showing the boundaries of the Liwas and Qadhas of the Mosul Vilayet together with the composition of the estimated population of each Qadha.”1925.
This collection of documentary sources, totalling 8000 pages, provides an extensive and highly structured collection of records for use by scholars, academics and intellectuals to create the historiographical context to support the study of Kurdish history for the period under review. The documents relate the early insurgencies by the Kurdish people directed against both regional and metropolitan powers, Kurdish inter-relations with neighbouring tribes and other ethnic groups at historical flash-points, and concomitantly depict the extent of territories pertaining to the Kurdish homeland, from the origins of nationalist sentiments through a series of disparate revolts in the nineteenth century and then on to a larger, more cohesive and discernible movement launched in the aftermath of World War I.
Although the principal and sustained debate about the future of “Kurdistan” per se may be said to date from c. 1919-20 as an issue of broader international concern and contention, significant material from the early nineteenth century can nevertheless be found within British official archives and thus a case based on long historical standing is traced. The observations around aspects of Kurdish nationalism and territoriality are made within the context of British interests in the region, reflecting both contemporary biases and those of individual writers. They focus chiefly on the overarching perspective of the British Government’s broader diplomatic relations with Persia, Russia and Turkey, firstly through the monitoring of international boundary disputes and frontier issues; secondly via assessments of strategic defence issues against any possible incursion towards the British Indian Empire, and thirdly on a commercial level, with a view to establishing channels for local trade. Great Britain was not directly seeking to establish its own regional hegemony and it could therefore be argued that these documents reveal Kurdish history with a degree of neutrality, without a bias on the outcome beyond British imperial interests; with individual officials at times revealing a degree of sympathy for the Kurdish position.
The use of the term “Kurdistan” generally refers to an agreed concept of a geographicalarea, not to a legal or political entity. Kurdish populations constitute part of Iran to its east, Turkey to the north, Iraq to the south and west, Syria tothe northwest. Kurdish-populated territory evolved over the nineteenth and twentieth century, with some regions becoming entrenched, while others were subject to constant flux. All relevant documents which could be traced from the surviving records of the Government of India at the British Library, and the records of the Foreign Office, War Office, India Office, Colonial Office and Cabinet at the National Archives, pertaining to Kurds or to Kurdistan as a regional constructfor the period, have been traced and included with the exception of duplicates and draft documents.
While the earlier period from 1806–1829 witnessed Kurdish uprisings such as the Baban Revolt in 1806 and a wave of insurrection in 1815, with an additionally significant revolt during 1828–1829, reference to these was not located in official records, perhaps because British representatives were not yet in situ observing events first-hand. Private papers outside the main two British Government archives, where perhaps further coverage might be found, have not been drawn on at this time.
I have not included some of the earliest nineteenth century documents in which the ink has faded and which are illegible even in the original format. Additionally, because copies of routine letters or drafts of war-time documents were typed on recycled paper or poor quality rough paper, the text often appears feint – also the case with military messages and copied correspondence in violet coloured ink.
The documents are arranged in approximate chronological order, with due regard to geographical sectors, and described in detail in a separate contents list. However, surviving post-war materials tend to be arranged by the originating Whitehall department or overseas post in subject files, and wherethis occurs it is respected, and documents are placed within an annual chronological order only. While papers may relate mainly to Iraq or originate from Baghdad or Kirkuk, they frequently concern Persian Kurds, or the nationalist movement in general, therefore contents divisions are not rigid but a narrative develops over time.